Wednesday 27 August 2014

PK's - Amir Khan - Contraversies

Amir Khan does it again…………


With Rs.400cr benchmark with DHOOM3 at the boxoffice , he is back in news again and  he is ready to give touch competition to other KHAN’s. Amir’s latest photo is most talked about on all social networking in which he is standing nude wearing nothing but vintage boom box. Poster became viral within moment he posted it.

He has been lauded by many B-town actor’s along with major response by Twitteratis and been critized picture and made fun of him.
Now after CID and Rajnikant’s joke we have AMIR’s new nude photo… Lets read some jokes which went viral…
Its just for fun and we do not promote or make fun of any artist or actor’s work. Therefore I request you to take it on a lighter note.


Amir’s is being compared with Sunny Leone’s pic…

PK’s  pic would have been more popular if it would have casted Sunny inplace of Amir as Sunny is more searched on search engine because of her past.



COURT Hearing on PK poster…
Legal suit filed by Hemant patil to put ban on screening of the film because of Amir’s poster in which he is standing wearing nothing but Vintage music box if  its not been removed from the movie.
In response to this legal suit, it was said that as poster is already approved by Film Publicity Screening Committee which is a government body, they have checked and approved it without any doubt.

According to the suit, the nude poster which has been circulated all over is vulgar and obscene and has the tendency to corrupt the minds of the people. This poster is being shown in newspapers and television and also on internet since last one month, the plaintiff claimed. The plaintiff said that Aamir is a good actor and a host of popular TV show Satyamev Jayate. He has a good and clean image in the eyes of public. However, by appearing nude in this poster for the sake of publicity, the actor had done a "shameful" act and hence he should withdraw such obscene images immediately.

The Supreme court had recently dismissed a Public Interest Litigation which sought a ban on the exhibition of posters in which a semi-naked Aamir stands on rail tracks for promoting the film PK. The apex court was of the view, "If you don't like then don't watch the film but don't bring religious facets in it," adding that, "these are matters of art and entertainment and let them remain so."
Hence, by virtue of the approval given by the Publicity Screening Committee of Films to this impugned poster, the suit was not maintainable in law and should be dismissed, Hirani and Khan stated in their reply.

They also argued that the suit was premature as the film was not yet complete and there were some portions of the film which were yet to be shot. Since the film was not completely shot, the question of Central Board of Film Certification examining it (the film) for grant of certificate did not arise.

"It is ludicrous for the plaintiff to commence an action on such a flimsy ground, especially when there is a quasi-judicial authority that is authorised to deal with such issues," the reply filed by the duo said.

Further, such a suit infringes upon their right to make films and hence should be dismissed outright, they contended.

They also argued that a similar issue was raised in another petition filed before the Supreme Court which had dismissed it. Hence, this suit also was liable to be dismissed.

Listen to Aamir's songs on Gaana.com

Civil judge M S Sharma has posted the matter on August 27 for arguments.

The judge asked the plaintiff's lawyer R N Kachave to satisfy the court whether a case of obscenity and vulgarity was made out against the actor who allegedly posed nude.


No comments:

Post a Comment